RCBE2 - I'm BACK

June 20th - Accents Galore.  Audio from 1st phone call from MA State Police to Neil baby in UK.  There are 4 parts to this phone conversation from Jan 23, 2006.

06/20 #1: I'm Back - Jan_23_06 "Phone Home Neil" call part 1

Well I must be doing something right

YouTube has permanent disabled my account!  Hello what is that all about!   JMCO but YouTube has nothing but flagrant Copyright Violations on there.  So I take a feed stream, capture & upload. 

Am I threatening the livelihood of CNN?

OOps - sorry another Copyright Infringement - I just copied this screen shot - so sorry.

PS. There's a guy in Romania that has been mirroring my channel in YouTube and he is still up.  Ha Ha.

Maybe Neil has been communicating with Mark Jensen

Here we go. Today in Stephanie Page's cross of Dr. William Zane, one of the apparent defense theories that is raising it's ugly head is suicide. That theory being that Rachel committed suicide and murdered her own baby Lilly. As some of you will remember, that was the bizarre theory that the Mark Jensen's defense submitted. That his wife, Julie Jensen plotted to set her husband up for murdering her and thereby chose to die an excruciating death by pouring herself a glass of anti-freeze.

Ilinois coroner John Scott Denton was asked to review Julie Jensen’s death for the defense. In Dr. Denton's report for the defense he concluded that Julie committed suicide and was not murdered.   Dr. Denton presented his theory that Julie committed suicide by poisoning herself at the trial. Refer to the below RealityCanBeEvil clip.

But in the brilliance of the prosecution cross examination by Jambois he was able to persuade  Dr. Denton to basically recant his report and findings that Julie had committed suicide. Refer to the clip below.

2/13 - #16 - Dr. Denton: I possibly can withdraw my previous opinion!

Also, a common statement in cross appears to be "things are not always what they appear to be".   I will be uploading a vid clip where that statement has been mentioned during cross of witnesses.

Did the Judge purposely stop a Perry Mason Moment in court today?

June 18, 2008
Double-murder trial of Neil Entwistle
Lillian & Rachel Souza Entwistle Murder

Larry James - PC Technician
Assistant District Attorney Daniel Bennett
Judge Diane Kottmyer

Selective clips from today's testimony revealing the internet keystrokes of Neil Entwistle between January 17 - 20, 2006. The tracking of the accused murderer during these days are critical. - the days that lead up to and including the date of the double homicide of his wife, Rachel Souza Entwistle, and his nine month baby, Lillian.
Neil Entwistle was searching for job posting sites, eBay / PayPal (where he had been running an internet scam operation), AdultFriendFinder, HalfPricedEscorts, BlondeBeauties - you get the picture. Specifically googled, "how to kill with a knife", "where to stab a body!, "knife in neck to kill" and "quick suicide methods". Finally a search to get out of Dodge quickly - Cheap Tickets to book his speedy one way return to the UK after the double homicide.

JMCO - I believe the judge purposely cut the questioning of the witness Larry Davis at that particular point - there must be a "gotcha" internet search to be in entered into evidence.

Additional and full testimony from the Neil Entwistle trial may be viewed @:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RealityCanBeEvil

Brisbaine Jury busy writing - trouble was they were playing a PUZZLE!

Su Doku-loving jurors force judge to abandon major drugs trial

From The Times
June 11, 2008
Su Doku-loving jurors force judge to abandon major drugs trial
Paul Larter in Brisbane

The jurors in a long-running Australian drugs trial were discharged in disgrace yesterday after it emerged that some of had spent more time in court playing Su Doku than they had listening to the evidence.

More than 100 witnesses had testified in the case of two men who faced life sentences for an alleged conspiracy to make a large amount of amphetamines. One man was charged with further firearms and drug possession offences.

The jurors had been commended by the judge for their diligence as they spent 66 days in the jury box, studiously taking notes.

After three months, both prosecution and defence were to have made their closing arguments this week. Then last week both of the accused noticed, while giving evidence, something that more than 20 police witnesses had not: that some of the jurors were writing vertically rather than horizontally. The culprit was Su Doku, the popular numbers puzzle from Japan in which players have to complete a 9x9 numbers grid.

“We were informed early on Monday of last week that that’s what was happening in the jury box and then subsequent to that I ... sort of took note to watch what was happening,” Robyn Hakelis, one of the defence lawyers, said outside the court.

“I noticed they were writing in all different directions and straight away I thought, ‘they’re not taking notes like we thought they were’. Everyone assumed they were taking notes.”

In a twist worthy of a television drama, the jury was effectively on trial as the judge heard evidence from the co-accused, a solicitor and the jury forewoman. She admitted to the judge yesterday that four or five jurors had been playing games since the second week of the trial but that Su Doku had not distracted her “too much” from proceedings.

“Yes, it helps me keep my mind busy paying more attention,” she said after being questioned by the judge. “Some of the evidence is rather drawn out and I find it difficult to maintain my attention the whole time.”

She said that jurors had photocopied Su Doku sheets to play during the trial and compare during meal breaks. The forewoman admitted to having spent more than half of her time in court playing the game.

Judge Peter Zahra summarily discharged the jury at Sydney District Court, aborting a trial that had cost taxpayers an estimated A$1 million (£490,000) since March 4 in lawyers’ fees, staff wages and court running costs.

He told the forewoman that she and her fellow Su Doku players had let down their peers on the jury and everyone else associated with the trial. They face no penalty, however, because inattentive behaviour in the jury box is not an offence.

A new trial is expected to begin in a few weeks after a new jury is empanelled.

"I think it’s disappointing more than anything that in a trial the evidence would not have been listened to. And jurors are sort of the judges of the facts and it’s very disappointing they weren’t giving our clients a fair trial,” Ms Hakelis said.

Fasten your seatbelts we are in for some rocky cross!

JMCO

Elliot Weinstein has started to do his cross of the technicians from the MA State Crime Lab. If there is any place that "reasonable doubt" may be planted, the possible incompetency of the MA State Crime Lab may be it. Examples are: chain of custody of the evidence, contamination of the crime scene, procedures (or lack thereof) at Crime Lab. As previously blogged, the MA Crime Lab did not get a flying colors review from an independent audit in 2007.

Humor applied to some Trial Vid Clips

JMCO - Neil starts the day with "PDA" - staged??

Wednesday, June 11,2008.

Neil started the day with PDA (Public Display of Affections) from his counsel.

JMCO - was this planned for the cameras??

Additional and full testimony from the Neil Entwistle trial may be viewed @:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RealityCanBeEvil